-1 We run everything under Tomcat. This would be a big, unnecessary hassle for ops and an obstacle to adoption.
wunder On May 2, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > +0 > > I have not used the .war for many many years -- I have nothing against > dropping it, but I wonder what problem we are solving. > > Is this just to avoid trying to officially support any setup other then the > solid/tested one? > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > I think solr should no longer be a war file but a search app. I don't care > how it accomplishes this: jetty, netty, its all up to us. > > Let me know your ideas: I think its a necessary step to move solr forwards. > >
