[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13705114#comment-13705114
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5081:
---------------------------------------

bq. I am not sure how these are used today. I was just asking in case there is 
something relying upon this. If they are just added as a "bonus" and not really 
needed by our codebase, then I am not sure we should worry... but its up to you.

+1, I have no use case at the moment to compare DocIdSets. Especially not 
cross-implementation.
                
> WAH8DocIdSet
> ------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5081
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5081
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.5
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5081.patch, LUCENE-5081.patch
>
>
> Our filters use bit sets a lot to store document IDs. However, it is likely 
> that most of them are sparse hence easily compressible. Having efficient 
> compressed sets would allow for caching more data.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to