[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712195#comment-13712195
 ] 

Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-4478:
-------------------------------------

Have found another problem here - what to do with core-specific properties?  
Core properties are passed to the SolrConfig object at construction, so there's 
no way at present to use a new set of properties with an existing configset.  
Same with IndexSchema, which re-uses the resource loader from SolrConfig.
                
> Allow cores to specify a named config set
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4478
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.2, 5.0
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>         Attachments: SOLR-4478.patch, SOLR-4478.patch
>
>
> Part of moving forward to "the new way", after SOLR-4196 etc... I propose an 
> additional parameter specified on the <core> node in solr.xml or as a 
> parameter in the "discovery" mode core.properties file, call it configSet, 
> where the value provided is a path to a directory, either absolute or 
> relative. Really, this is as though you copied the conf directory somewhere 
> to be used by more than one core.
> Straw-man: There will be a directory <solr_home>/configsets which will be the 
> default. If the configSet parameter is, say, "myconf", then I'd expect a 
> directory named "myconf" to exist in <solr_home>/configsets, which would look 
> something like
> <solr_home>/configsets/myconf/schema.xml
>                               solrconfig.xml
>                               stopwords.txt
>                               velocity
>                               velocity/query.vm
> etc.
> If multiple cores used the same configSet, schema, solrconfig etc. would all 
> be shared (i.e. shareSchema="true" would be assumed). I don't see a good 
> use-case for _not_ sharing schemas, so I don't propose to allow this to be 
> turned off. Hmmm, what if shareSchema is explicitly set to false in the 
> solr.xml or properties file? I'd guess it should be honored but maybe log a 
> warning?
> Mostly I'm putting this up for comments. I know that there are already 
> thoughts about how this all should work floating around, so before I start 
> any work on this I thought I'd at least get an idea of whether this is the 
> way people are thinking about going.
> Configset can be either a relative or absolute path, if relative it's assumed 
> to be relative to <solr_home>.
> Thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to