[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13715267#comment-13715267
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5057:
--------------------------------------
Hmmm, my initial reaction was that it'd be hard to figure out what clauses were
"equivalent". But I suppose a simple lexical ordering of all the "relevant"
clauses would work for this. Of course the work-around is to generate your fq
clauses in the same order every time.....
> queryResultCache should not related with the order of fq's list
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5057
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5057
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3
> Reporter: Feihong Huang
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> There are two case query with the same meaning below. But the case2 can't use
> the queryResultCache when case1 is executed.
> case1: q=*:*&fq=field1:value1&fq=field2:value2
> case2: q=*:*&fq=field2:value2&fq=field1:value1
> I think queryResultCache should not be related with the order of fq's list.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
