[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-5147.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
I started to do it, but this has a large impact on tests. I don't see how much
value it brings, plus an app can easily put the results in a map and lookup
requests:
{code}
Map<FacetRequest,FacetResult> results = new HashMap<>();
for (FacetResult fres : facetResults) {
results.put(fres.getFacetRequest(), fres);
}
{code}
Resolving as Won't Fix for now, if this will be a problem we can reopen.
> Consider returning a Map<FacetRequest,FacetResult> from FacetsAccumulator
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5147
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5147
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/facet
> Reporter: Shai Erera
>
> Today the API returns a List which suggests there's an ordering going on.
> This may be confusing if one uses FacetsAccumulator.create which results in a
> MultiFacetsAccumulator, and then the order of the results does not correspond
> to the order of the requests.
> Rather than trying to enforce ordering, a simple mapping may be better even
> for consuming apps since they will be able to easily lookup desired results.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
