[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13737385#comment-13737385
 ] 

Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-3076:
----------------------------------------

[~thetaphi] what is the reason of delaying this functionality, if we can 
deliver it now with the following configuration "footprint"?

{code:xml}
        <query>
               <cache name="cachingWrapperFilterCache" 
class="solr.search.LRUCache">
        </query>
        <queryParser name="parent" class="join.BlockJoinParentQParserPlugin">

           <!-- if you omit this BJQ will perform "suboptimal", 
                 thought functionally complete, 
                also it annoyingly warns -->

                <str name="parent-filter-cache">cachingWrapperFilterCache</str>
        </queryParser>
{code}

Broken Solr on segments seems crucial to me too. 
I suppose that refactoring will take even much time than this modest piece of 
functionality. I feel it's really challenging from design perspective e.g. can 
CachingWrapperFilter flip between dense and sparse sets already? shouldn't it 
use off-heap memory like in LUCENE-5052 rather than pollute the heap? whether 
filters behavior is defined in index time or can be requested ad-hoc? etc

Once again, what about going ahead with small configuration footprint, without 
diverging join queries.

thanks
                
> Solr(Cloud) should support block joins
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3076
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>             Fix For: 4.5, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: 27M-singlesegment-histogram.png, 27M-singlesegment.png, 
> bjq-vs-filters-backward-disi.patch, bjq-vs-filters-illegal-state.patch, 
> child-bjqparser.patch, dih-3076.patch, dih-config.xml, 
> parent-bjq-qparser.patch, parent-bjq-qparser.patch, Screen Shot 2012-07-17 at 
> 1.12.11 AM.png, SOLR-3076-childDocs.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, 
> SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, 
> SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, 
> SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, SOLR-3076.patch, 
> SOLR-7036-childDocs-solr-fork-trunk-patched, 
> solrconf-bjq-erschema-snippet.xml, solrconfig.xml.patch, 
> tochild-bjq-filtered-search-fix.patch
>
>
> Lucene has the ability to do block joins, we should add it to Solr.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to