[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13743814#comment-13743814
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5150:
-----------------------------------
bq. But the sync simply kills concurrent query reads.
Sorry, I was not being very careful with my words. The 'sync' option (with the
seek + read) kills concurrent query reads - but I don't think it's the sync at
all. The first perf tests I looked at with just a readFully had a sync as well
- which seems to make sense because this is not an NRT test or anything.
Everything seems to be related to the hdfs calls.
> HdfsIndexInput may not fully read requested bytes.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5150
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.4
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 4.5, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-5150.patch
>
>
> Patrick Hunt noticed that our HdfsDirectory code was a bit behind Blur here -
> the read call we are using may not read all of the requested bytes - it
> returns the number of bytes actually written - which we ignore.
> Blur moved to using a seek and then readFully call - synchronizing across the
> two calls to deal with clones.
> We have seen that really kills performance, and using the readFully call that
> lets you pass the position rather than first doing a seek, performs much
> better and does not require the synchronization.
> I also noticed that the seekInternal impl should not seek but be a no op
> since we are seeking on the read.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
