[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5189:
-------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-5189.patch
Patch adds per-field support. I currently do that by adding a boolean
'isFieldUpdate' to SegWriteState which is set to true only by
ReaderAndLiveDocs. PerFieldDVF then peeks into that boolean and if it's true,
it reads the format name from FieldInfo.attributes() instead of relying on
Codec.getPerFieldDVF(). If we'll eventually gen FieldInfos, there won't be a
need for this boolean as PerFieldDVF will get that from FI.dvGen.
So far all Codecs work. I had to remove an assert from SimpleText which tested
that all fields read from the file are in the state.fieldInfos. But it doesn't
use that information, only an assert. And SegCoreReader now passes to each
DVProducer only the fields it needs to read.
Added some tests too.
> Numeric DocValues Updates
> -------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5189
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5189
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Attachments: LUCENE-5189.patch, LUCENE-5189.patch, LUCENE-5189.patch,
> LUCENE-5189.patch, LUCENE-5189.patch, LUCENE-5189.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-4258 we started to work on incremental field updates, however the
> amount of changes are immense and hard to follow/consume. The reason is that
> we targeted postings, stored fields, DV etc., all from the get go.
> I'd like to start afresh here, with numeric-dv-field updates only. There are
> a couple of reasons to that:
> * NumericDV fields should be easier to update, if e.g. we write all the
> values of all the documents in a segment for the updated field (similar to
> how livedocs work, and previously norms).
> * It's a fairly contained issue, attempting to handle just one data type to
> update, yet requires many changes to core code which will also be useful for
> updating other data types.
> * It has value in and on itself, and we don't need to allow updating all the
> data types in Lucene at once ... we can do that gradually.
> I have some working patch already which I'll upload next, explaining the
> changes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]