[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13769988#comment-13769988
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5244:
-----------------------------------

bq. I think scoring and ranking will be difficult because the priority queues 
will take up too much memory and be too slow.

I agree that it will be more difficult and certainly a slower operation, but if 
you are looking to export an entire results list, 'slow' is very relative and 
use case dependent.

My main interest in this is in 1 - it's a pretty common want. Using search for 
sub-selection that can be processed by something else.

I think it would be great if that sub selection could come out ranked though - 
I think that is also valuable for 1 - and while the other system could somehow 
rank, it would have to dupe the lucene logic to do it as well. It would be nice 
to just be able to dump either way and make your decision based on use case and 
speed reqs. It's obviously going to be much slower though. And you would have 
to deal with huge result sets and limited ram of course.
                
> Full Search Result Export
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5244
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: search
>    Affects Versions: 5.0
>            Reporter: Joel Bernstein
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-5244.patch
>
>
> It would be great if Solr could efficiently export entire search result sets 
> without scoring or ranking documents. This would allow external systems to 
> perform rapid bulk imports from Solr. It also provides a possible platform 
> for exporting results to support distributed join scenarios within Solr.
> This ticket provides a patch that has two pluggable components:
> 1) ExportQParserPlugin: which is a post filter that gathers a BitSet with 
> document results and does not delegate to ranking collectors. Instead it puts 
> the BitSet on the request context.
> 2) BinaryExportWriter: Is a output writer that iterates the BitSet and prints 
> the entire result as a binary stream. A header is provided at the beginning 
> of the stream so external clients can self configure.
> Note:
> These two components will be sufficient for a non-distributed environment. 
> For distributed export a new Request handler will need to be developed.
> After applying the patch and building the dist or example, you can register 
> the components through the following changes to solrconfig.xml
> Register export contrib libraries:
> <lib dir="../../../dist/" regex="solr-export-\d.*\.jar" />
>  
> Register the "export" queryParser with the following line:
>  
> <queryParser name="export" 
> class="org.apache.solr.export.ExportQParserPlugin"/>
>  
> Register the "xbin" writer:
>  
> <queryResponseWriter name="xbin" 
> class="org.apache.solr.export.BinaryExportWriter"/>
>  
> The following query will perform the export:
> {code}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:*&fq={!export}&wt=xbin&fl=join_i
> {code}
> Initial patch supports export of four data-types:
> 1) Single value trie int, long and float
> 2) Binary doc values.
> The numerics are currently exported from the FieldCache and the Binary doc 
> values can be in memory or on disk.
> Since this is designed to export very large result sets efficiently, stored 
> fields are not used for the export.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to