[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13793666#comment-13793666
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5325:
-----------------------------------

I think that the reason that this is hard to catch in a test is that we try and 
do retries on connectionloss up to the expiration time - there must be some 
case where we were still getting a connectionloss and no expiration though. 
This issue should handle that case for this particular bit of code, but as an 
overall precautionary measure, I have also bumped up the retries just a bit to 
try and ensure they are going beyond the session timeout.

> zk connection loss causes overseer leader loss
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5325
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.3, 4.4, 4.5
>            Reporter: Christine Poerschke
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 4.5.1, 4.6, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-5325.patch, SOLR-5325.patch, SOLR-5325.patch
>
>
> The problem we saw was that when the solr overseer leader experienced 
> temporary zk connectivity problems it stopped processing overseer queue 
> events.
> This first happened when quorum within the external zk ensemble was lost due 
> to too many zookeepers being stopped (similar to SOLR-5199). The second time 
> it happened when there was a sufficient number of zookeepers but they were 
> holding zookeeper leadership elections and thus refused connections (the 
> elections were taking several seconds, we were using the default 
> zookeeper.cnxTimeout=5s value and it was hit for one ensemble member).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to