This has actually bit me before too ...

I mean, sure, I do eventually notice that it ran too quickly and so it
was not in fact really SUCCESSFUL.

Why would Rob's example fail?  In that case, it would have in fact run
TestIndexWriter, right?  (Sure, other modules didn't have such a test,
but the fact that one of the visited modules did have the test should
mean that the overall ant run is SUCCESSFUL?).  Is it just too hard
with ant to make this logic be "across modules"?

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see, didn't think about that usecase. Ok so let's not do it.
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > What's the harm of failing the build in that case?
>> >
>>
>> because i should be able to do this and for it to pass:
>>
>> cd lucene/
>> ant test -Dtestcase=TestIndexWriter
>>
>> So please, don't make this change. it would totally screw everything up
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to