[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13804097#comment-13804097
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5381:
----------------------------------
[~markrmil...@gmail.com] as the man who conceived SolrCloud, I'm sure you will
have more insight into the problems with different approaches.
Do we have a choice of not scaling to a VERY LARGE cluster ? I think it will be
suicidal.
What we need to do is identify and list the the low hanging fruits and solve
them one by one.
> Split Clusterstate and scale
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5381
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5381
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SolrCloud
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Original Estimate: 2,016h
> Remaining Estimate: 2,016h
>
> clusterstate.json is a single point of contention for all components in
> SolrCloud. It would be hard to scale SolrCloud beyond a few thousand nodes
> because there are too many updates and too many nodes need to be notified of
> the changes. As the no:of nodes go up the size of clusterstate.json keeps
> going up and it will soon exceed the limit impossed by ZK.
> The first step is to store the shards information in separate nodes and each
> node can just listen to the shard node it belongs to. We may also need to
> split each collection into its own node and the clusterstate.json just
> holding the names of the collections .
> This is an umbrella issue
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
