[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13824299#comment-13824299
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4260:
-----------------------------------

Right - but that's just impl, not design. The idea is that, since we add 
locally first, there is not much reason it should fail on a replica - unless 
that replica has crashed or lost connectivity or something really bad. In that 
case, it will have to reconnect to zk and recover or restart and recover. Just 
in case, as a precaution, we try and tell it to recover - then if it's still 
got connectivity or it was an intermittent problem, it won't run around acting 
active. I think I have a note about perhaps doing more retries in background 
threads for that recovery request, but I've never gotten to it.

If you are finding a scenario that eludes that, we should strengthen the impl.

> Inconsistent numDocs between leader and replica
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 5.0
>         Environment: 5.0.0.2013.01.04.15.31.51
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>         Attachments: 192.168.20.102-replica1.png, 
> 192.168.20.104-replica2.png, clusterstate.png
>
>
> After wiping all cores and reindexing some 3.3 million docs from Nutch using 
> CloudSolrServer we see inconsistencies between the leader and replica for 
> some shards.
> Each core hold about 3.3k documents. For some reason 5 out of 10 shards have 
> a small deviation in then number of documents. The leader and slave deviate 
> for roughly 10-20 documents, not more.
> Results hopping ranks in the result set for identical queries got my 
> attention, there were small IDF differences for exactly the same record 
> causing a record to shift positions in the result set. During those tests no 
> records were indexed. Consecutive catch all queries also return different 
> number of numDocs.
> We're running a 10 node test cluster with 10 shards and a replication factor 
> of two and frequently reindex using a fresh build from trunk. I've not seen 
> this issue for quite some time until a few days ago.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to