Erick, if by “4.6 label” you mean “4.6 svn tag”, the release process has this 
happening after the vote, not before, since otherwise you have to move the tag 
when an RC fails: <http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Publishing>

Steve

On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Same thing happens on my macbook FWIW, running on 4x. BTW, I didn't see a 4.6 
> label, am I missing something?
> 
> Erick
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Smoke tester found a reproducible test failure in lucene/suggest, under both 
> java6 and java7 on my Macbook Pro - I don’t have time to investigate today - 
> here’s the java7 failure:
> 
> ——
>    [junit4] Suite: 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest
>    [junit4]   2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test  
> -Dtestcase=DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest -Dtests.method=testWithDeletions 
> -Dtests.seed=6ACAAA8898D1B1C8 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=sk 
> -Dtests.timezone=Indian/Maldives -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
>    [junit4] ERROR   0.86s | 
> DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest.testWithDeletions <<<
>    [junit4]    > Throwable #1: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Reader has 
> to have at least one leaf
>    [junit4]    >        at 
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6ACAAA8898D1B1C8:4343D2A86CE05A8]:0)
>    [junit4]    >        at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentExpressionDictionary$DocumentExpressionInputIterator.<init>(DocumentExpressionDictionary.java:111)
>    [junit4]    >        at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentExpressionDictionary.getWordsIterator(DocumentExpressionDictionary.java:95)
>    [junit4]    >        at 
> org.apache.lucene.search.suggest.DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest.testWithDeletions(DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest.java:184)
>    [junit4]    >        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724)
>    [junit4]   2> NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene45, 
> sim=DefaultSimilarity, locale=sk, timezone=Indian/Maldives
>    [junit4]   2> NOTE: Mac OS X 10.9 x86_64/Oracle Corporation 1.7.0_25 
> (64-bit)/cpus=8,threads=1,free=5635480,total=18587648
>    [junit4]   2> NOTE: All tests run in this JVM: 
> [DocumentExpressionDictionaryTest]
>    [junit4] Completed in 1.29s, 1 test, 1 error <<< FAILURES!
> ——
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Nov 19, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Please vote for the third Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.6.0
> > (don't be irritated by that this is RC4 I build on that I didn't put
> > up for vote)
> >
> > This RC includes some additional fixes related to Changes.html that
> > were committed in the last days like SOLR-5397 as well as:
> >
> > SOLR-5464: Add option to ConcurrentSolrServer to stream pure delete 
> > requests.
> > SOLR-5465: SolrCmdDistributor retry logic has a concurrency race bug.
> > SOLR-5452: Do not attempt to proxy internal update requests.
> >
> > you can download it here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.6.0-RC4-rev1543363/
> >
> > or run the smoke tester directly with this commandline (don't forget
> > to set JAVA6_HOME etc.):
> >
> > python3.2 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> > http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.6.0-RC4-rev1543363/
> > 1543363 4.6.0 /tmp/smoke_test_4_6
> >
> > I integrated the RC into Elasticsearch and all tests pass:
> >
> > https://github.com/s1monw/elasticsearch/tree/upgrade_lucene_4_6
> >
> > Smoketester said: SUCCESS! [1:08:00.010026]
> >
> > here is my +1
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to