[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13856009#comment-13856009
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4260:
-----------------------------------

Yeah, that's currently expected. We don't expect the case where you can talk to 
ZooKeeper but not your replicas to be common, so we kind of punted on this 
scenario for the first phase.

Some related JIRA issues:

SOLR-5482
SOLR-5450
SOLR-5495       

I think we should do all that, but the key is really, in this case, we need to 
pass the order to recover through ZooKeeper to the partitioned off replica. 
With an eventually consistent model, it can be off for a short time, but it 
needs to recover in a timely manner.

I think this is the right solution because the replica is sure to either get 
the information to recover from ZooKeeper or lose it's connection to ZooKeeper 
in which case it will have to recover anyway.

> Inconsistent numDocs between leader and replica
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>         Environment: 5.0.0.2013.01.04.15.31.51
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.7
>
>         Attachments: 192.168.20.102-replica1.png, 
> 192.168.20.104-replica2.png, clusterstate.png
>
>
> After wiping all cores and reindexing some 3.3 million docs from Nutch using 
> CloudSolrServer we see inconsistencies between the leader and replica for 
> some shards.
> Each core hold about 3.3k documents. For some reason 5 out of 10 shards have 
> a small deviation in then number of documents. The leader and slave deviate 
> for roughly 10-20 documents, not more.
> Results hopping ranks in the result set for identical queries got my 
> attention, there were small IDF differences for exactly the same record 
> causing a record to shift positions in the result set. During those tests no 
> records were indexed. Consecutive catch all queries also return different 
> number of numDocs.
> We're running a 10 node test cluster with 10 shards and a replication factor 
> of two and frequently reindex using a fresh build from trunk. I've not seen 
> this issue for quite some time until a few days ago.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to