We have an ICLA from him but there's some confusion regarding the CCLA from his employer.
-- Itamar Syn-Hershko http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Souren Aghajanyan < suren.aghajan...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Itamar, is this CLA issue related to Russell Trupiano drop? > > Thanks, > Souren. > > -----Original Message----- > From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 8:29 AM > To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lucene.NET 4.8.0 status update > > This sounds very good. I'm holding off on this effort for a bit now as we > are awaiting clearance on some CLA issue we have with the contributed code. > I hope this will get clarified ASAP and we could merge the code in. > > You are more than welcome to take the code from here > https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0 and start > digging into some of the failing tests,I could definitely use some help > with fixing them > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action < > http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Rahul Singh (ANANT) <rahul.si...@anant.us > > > wrote: > > > Gentlemen, > > > > Thanks for the great work on porting the latest Lucene. I have been > > working with the binary builds of Lucene.NET and after digging deep > > into the latest Java versions. > > > > I was thinking of contributing in the following ways : > > > > 1. Better documentation / examples / etc. > > 2. Regression Testing / Integration Testing 3. Bug Fixes 4. Anything > > else. > > > > I wanted to get involved earlier but it's been a busy summer of work. > > > > Rahul > > > > > > Rahul Singh | Internet Architect & Partner > > > > To empower people through the Internet to create a better world. > > > > How are we doing? Please take our survey > > <http://links.anant.us/customerfeedbacksurvey> > > > > Anant | http://anant.us > > 1010 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 250 > > Washington, D.C. 20007 > > > > o 1.855.ANANTCO x101 | m 202.905.2818 | t @xingh > > <http://www.twitter.com/xingh> | li xingh < > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/xingh> | fb rahul.singh > > <http://www.facebook.com/rahul.singh> > > > > *This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do > > not necessarily represent those of Anant Corporation . If you are not > > the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action > > based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please > > contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in > > error.* > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko > > <ita...@code972.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Awesome. I'm still making progress on fixing tests on my branch, so > > > make sure you rebase every now and then. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > Freelance Developer & Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action > > > <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I got mentally preoccupied by work once again... > > > > > > > > I've forked the code and see the failing tests. Some tests seems > > > > to randomly hang, guessing due to the thread-lock-issues mentioned > > > previously. > > > > There are a few failing tests which targets easier areas, like > > > > query-parsing/objects. I will take a look at those issues to get > > familiar > > > > with everything. (Hopefully also fixing something...) > > > > > > > > // Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/14 09:25, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: > > > > > > > >> Great! > > > >> > > > >> There's no such thing as "contrib" anymore, fwiw. You should > > > >> clone my > > > repo > > > >> and work on that until Prescott / Troy sort out the CLAs. > > > >> > > > >> With regards to what you can work on - there are many failing > > > >> tests, > > > some > > > >> of them are in the analysis area. You can either start poking > > > >> around trying to fix those tests, or start porting the analyzers, > > > >> highlighter, etc packages. The idea is to have > > > >> Lucene.Net.Analyzers, > > > Lucene.Net.Highlighter > > > >> etc packages - a package here: > > > >> https://github.com/synhershko/lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0/sr > > > >> c > > > (where > > > >> core will be renamed to Lucene.Net later, I just don't want to > > > >> lose > > git > > > >> history now) for every package here: > > > >> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_8_0/luce > > > >> ne > > > >> > > > >> Does that make sense? > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> > > > >> Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >> http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > > > >> > > > >> Freelance Developer & Consultant > > > >> Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Simon Svensson > > > >> <si...@devhost.se> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> I feel like I'm mostly lurking in a highly unproductive way; > > > >>> time to change that! > > > >>> > > > >>> I would like to spend more time with the code, but do not know > > > >>> where > > to > > > >>> start and what to focus on. I'm proficient in C# and everything > > > related, > > > >>> but the inner workings of the lucene core is shrouded in > > > >>> mystery. I > > > guess > > > >>> that places me in the contrib/analyzers/documentation area. > > > >>> > > > >>> So, since I'm in need of some guidance; > > > >>> 1) What should I focus on? > > > >>> 2) Should I fork Itamar's bransch and send pull-requests to it? > > > >>> > > > >>> // Simon > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On 08/08/14 05:34, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hi all. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I've been working on the 4.8 branch to try and stabilize it so > > > >>>> it > > can > > > be > > > >>>> the base for our next release. There's still plenty to do, but > > > >>>> I was able to make decent progress. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This thread will be used for me to report progress and > > > >>>> hopefully get some more people involved. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> My branch is here: https://github.com/synhershko/ > > > >>>> lucene.net/tree/Lucene.Net_4.8.0 > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Out of about 2300 tests currently, there are about 600 failing > > > >>>> tests > > > and > > > >>>> the rest are green. At least 300 of the failing tests are due > > > >>>> to > > > missing > > > >>>> codecs (some codecs haven't been ported yet). The rest of the > > failures > > > >>>> can > > > >>>> be largely categorized as below. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1. The missing codecs need to be ported (into a separate > assembly). > > > >>>> There > > > >>>> isn't too much of code to port and work is pretty much self > > contained. > > > >>>> However completing this will make about 300 tests green. > > > >>>> The code to port is here: https://github.com/apache/ > > > >>>> lucene-solr/tree/lucene_solr_4_8_0/lucene/codecs/src/java/ > > > >>>> org/apache/lucene/codecs > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2. Compressed fields implementation is largely broken. Quite a > > > >>>> few > > > test > > > >>>> are red and I'm pretty sure the fix is quite simple, just a > > > >>>> faulty implementation to quickly re-write. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 3. Many, many tests are very slow or even deadlocking because > > > >>>> of threading issues. Culprits are both IndexWriter and > FSDirectory. > > This > > > is > > > >>>> the most severe and probably challenging issue to solve. > > > >>>> There are multiple failures which I believe relate to this issue. > > > >>>> "Access > > > >>>> to the path is denied." on index files, failing Asserts etc. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 4. The fsync implementation (in FSDirectory) needs some love > > > >>>> and testing. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 5. The rest of the failing tests are probably isolated porting > > issues > > > >>>> (Java / C# differences or bugs introduced while porting). I > > attached a > > > >>>> screenshot of one such error, thrown using Debug.Assert from > > > >>>> the > > core > > > >>>> while > > > >>>> running some of the tests. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Other items to tackle later: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1. CLS compliance. Maybe the biggest item there is the > > > >>>> byte/sbyte > > > thing > > > >>>> we discussed several times before. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2. Porting the contribs. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 3. Cleaning up the API and XML comments > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 4. Fixing the license header in all source files > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 5. CI pipeline and SlowTest attribute to have some tests run > > > >>>> only on nightly builds or similar > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Anyone up for some coding? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Itamar Syn-Hershko > > > >>>> http://code972.com <http://code972.com/> | @synhershko < > > > >>>> https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance Developer & > > > >>>> Consultant Author of RavenDB in Action > > > >>>> <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > >
