Sounds like a reasonable approach to me. On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Laimonas Simutis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let's give it a few more runs to get a better idea if it is consistent. And > as you mentioned, this could be a case of us having been errorring out > sooner previously. It is just hard to tell right away the with randomized > input. > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Wyatt Barnett <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > FYI this has caused the tests to take significantly longer -- typical > test > > runs were 25 minutes, after this PR was merged we got 42 minutes. No idea > > if that is because we are hitting places we errored out of very quickly > or > > if we altered performance in some way. > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:18 PM, asfgit <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/62 > > > > > > > > > --- > > > If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have > > your > > > reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this > > feature > > > enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, > > please > > > contact infrastructure at [email protected] <javascript:;> or > file a JIRA > > ticket > > > with INFRA. > > > --- > > > > > >
