NightOwl888 commented on issue #768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/768#issuecomment-1355952643

   Actually, after thinking this through a bit more, rather than wiring up a 
new console app, it makes more sense to simply fire up `dotnet test` and point 
it to the assembly that has the test in it with an [NUnit 
filter](https://docs.nunit.org/articles/nunit/running-tests/Test-Selection-Language.html)
 to only run the one test. The test framework extends NUnit and contains a lot 
of plumbing that will be required to get test to set up properly so this will 
save a lot of work.
   
   We don't need to dynamically compile anything because the project this test 
is in contains the test we need to run. So by the time we run the test there is 
already a DLL file that we can pass to `dotnet test` to run. The test just 
needs to use the assembly that it is in to get the full path of the DLL file to 
execute. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/52956.
   
   As for target framework, we have another test where we have done that 
already.
   
   - 
[InstallationTest](https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/blob/c0c480409e2d3424fbdcc563426c66cacbf72632/src/dotnet/tools/Lucene.Net.Tests.Cli/InstallationTest.cs#L123-L129)
 reads a custom `MetaDataAttribute` where the moniker for the current target 
framework is compiled into the assembly.
   - The build adds the `MetaDataAttribute` 
[here](https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/blob/c0c480409e2d3424fbdcc563426c66cacbf72632/src/dotnet/tools/Lucene.Net.Tests.Cli/Lucene.Net.Tests.Cli.csproj#L52-L58).
 Simply use the same approach in the `Lucene.Net.Tests._I-J.csproj` file.
   
   The above test also has an example of using `System.Diagnostics.Process` to 
launch an external command.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to