nikcio commented on issue #793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/issues/793#issuecomment-1656728073

   I've been reading your latest comments about the problems with versioning 
and a production release and think I have an idea to solve this problem. What 
if we use the Lucene version as is and then add an extra number to the end to 
signal the current iteration of the version? That way you still have the 
consistency of matching the Lucene Java version and .Net version but can still 
make improvements like bug fixes that weren't caught in a preview/beta phase. 
(See this image for an example)
   
   ![Group 
2](https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/assets/24605285/754c5947-9a4b-4672-bba3-d1cb0d9342e8)
   
   We also have to remember that no one can be sure that they have bug-free 
software and that unforeseen problems do come up no matter how long we work on 
something. So I think it would be better to use iterations instead of 
neverending beta releases like there have been for a while now with the current 
4.8.0 release. This also gives a better signal of when you can use Lucene in 
production as has been mentioned time and time again that many people do even 
though it's in beta.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to