On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote:
> Two alternatives. > > One, ignore me. We'll end up like CXF, which looks like: > > cxf/ > trunk > tags > branches > sandboxes > dosgi > web > osgi > > in other words, the subproject top-levels and such are just sitting > there next to the main project's trunk/tag/branches. That gave me an > itch, thus .... > > > Two, which was my original idea: > > mahout/ > code/ > java?/ > trunk,tags,branches > collections/ > trunk,tag,branches > something-else-next-week/ > trunk,tag,branches > sandboxes > web > > So the current top would become repos/mahout/code/java ? > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On May 11, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > >> Grant, just to be tiresome, I'll remind you that relocating the > >> existing mahout svn root down a directory level will reduce the effort > >> level of the later introductions of subprojects, sandboxes, etc. > > > > What's the structure that you propose? > > > > We have now: > > /mahout > > /trunk > > /tags/ > > /branches > > /pmc > > > > > > > > >
