How about adding a Mahout Mapper/Reducer Layer. it has lots of cons like
maintainability. But it will ease out a lot of dependency problem and it may
help adoption in non-hadoop frameworks.

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's a good perspective. I don't think moving to the new APIs is
> that burdensome, especially as we're doing a better and better job of
> centralizing and standardizing our approach to interacting with
> Hadoop.
>
> I somehow sense we're going to need to run 'close to the metal' with
> Hadoop to squeeze maximum performance out of it. Hence maybe we aren't
> the casual users that would most benefit from a layer in between. But
> that's just a hunch.
>
> This is, so far, an isolated issue that I'm attacking. Maybe it is
> just bad practice to have two mappers with different inputs but I
> think it's a handy trick.
>
> For now, I may punt and just use the old code for this particular
> mechanism, since it's only deprecated. When/if it goes away, then we
> can really deal with it. By that time maybe new solutions are
> available.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I presume that Robin's rework addresses this, right?
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Chris K Wensel <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: Moving to new Hadoop APIs
> > To: Ted Dunning <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > you guys need to update the mail list page. still sends to
> lucene.apache.org
> >
> > On May 25, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Chris K Wensel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not on the list.
> >>
> >> here is my opinion on the new apis
> >>
> >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/cascading-user/browse_thread/thread/4dc26b68401bbc0f#
> >>
> >> and here
> >>
> >>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2855167/which-hadoop-api-version-should-i-use/2859863#2859863
> >>
> >> I can reply to the list, but am rushing out of the office. let me know.
> >>
> >> ckw
> >>
>

Reply via email to