Huzzah!

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Ted Dunning (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900200#action_12900200]
>
> Ted Dunning commented on MAHOUT-228:
> ------------------------------------
>
> OK.
>
> I think that was the final commit of the basic M-228 functionality.  The
> results should appear in
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Mahout-Quality/204/
>
> We now have a reasonable selection of alternatives for online vector
> learning.  This includes versions that do online cross-validation with AUC
> and a version that does hyper-parameter selection and annealing using
> evolutionary techniques on top of the on-line cross-validation version.
>
> I will be adding test cases over the next few weeks, but after the dust
> clears here, I will be closing M-228.  Jake should be proud.
>
> > Need sequential logistic regression implementation using SGD techniques
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: MAHOUT-228
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-228
> >             Project: Mahout
> >          Issue Type: New Feature
> >          Components: Classification
> >            Reporter: Ted Dunning
> >            Assignee: Ted Dunning
> >             Fix For: 0.4
> >
> >         Attachments: logP.csv, MAHOUT-228-3.patch,
> MAHOUT-228-interfaces.patch, MAHOUT-228.patch, MAHOUT-228.patch,
> MAHOUT-228.patch, MAHOUT-228.patch, r.csv, sgd-derivation.pdf,
> sgd-derivation.tex, sgd.csv, TrainLogisticTest.patch
> >
> >
> > Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is often fast enough for highly
> scalable learning (see Vowpal Wabbit, http://hunch.net/~vw/).
> > I often need to have a logistic regression in Java as well, so that is a
> reasonable place to start.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>

Reply via email to