[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12910279#action_12910279
]
Ted Dunning edited comment on MAHOUT-503 at 9/16/10 3:38 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Note this comment in the test cases for MurmurHash:
{code}
// test data generated by running MurmurHash2_64.cpp
{code}
I did quite a bit of changing around of Andrej's version of the code in this
port and generated test vectors much the way that the article you cite did.
was (Author: tdunning):
Note this comment in the test cases for MurmurHash:
{code}
// test data generated by running MurmurHash2_64.cpp
{code}
> Bad murmur hash implementation ?!?
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-503
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-503
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Classification
> Reporter: Thomas Sauzedde
>
> It looks like the murmur hash implementation is coming from the original C to
> Java port (see http://www.getopt.org/murmur/MurmurHash.java)
> According to http://dmy999.com/article/50/murmurhash-2-java-port, (not
> verified myself), this port doesn't produce the same results than the
> original C code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
