+1 I'm in agreement with Sean that we are, defacto, Hadoop-based right now even if our charter is broader. I'm not hung up on the precise wording in this status report
-----Original Message----- From: Sean Owen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Apache Board report for January 2011 Fixed. I suppose I'm trying to communicate some news about what's happened in the last 3 months, and there hasn't been much concrete, so wanted to say something about the roadmap and what's taking shape in practice. There's no mission to be only Hadoop-based, but, in practice, that's what it mostly is now. I think it's useful to be able to state that as a piece of current status. But the wording can be clearer about that sentiment. Is that the sentiment then? On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you meant Hadoop here. > > Also, I take issue with the idea of Mahout being Hadoop based. I prefer to > characterize it as scalable machine learning, taking advantage of Hadoop > where appropriate. > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Apache *Mahout* 0.20.x-based machine learning, for collaborative >> filtering, >> >
