I'm the same as Ted -- I have a local repo only and maintain my branches in there. Don't know about interoperability with other existing git-svn mirrors like the ones you mentioned, sorry.
Dawid On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I use git svn exclusively any more. > > But all of my git mirrors come from the base that I synchronize using svn. > I haven't try squishing. > > I have been maintaining 4-7 local branches this way for some time. Works > like a champ. > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlyubi...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > in case of ASF though i found that git svn for some reason checks out > > commit history with commit md5 which are different than those > > propagated to github (and i guess git.apache.org). So commit from > > other branches (merged to git-mirrored trunks) cannot be > > merge-squashed to git-svn branch because they fail to establish base > > version correctly and try to reply a lot more history they actually > > should. > > > > i guess i have to revert to just doing dirrect patch application. > > > > git diff -R MAHOUT-??? | patch -p1 > > > > it's a bit of a shame. > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Dawid Weiss > > <dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote: > > > Works like a charm in my experience, although you should be careful > > about: > > > > > > a) merging; best merge local branches with squashing, so that they > > > appear as a single patch rather than a commit sequence. > > > b) empty folders (remember about setting --rmdir if you're removing > > > something that should remove folders as well). > > > > > > Dawid > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> Any concerns about git-svn as a commit tool? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> -Dima > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
