I think removing the wiki pages is a bandaid fix for the real problem which is confluence being too bulky and not doing caching of generated html on its own. Will the infra allow us to host a light weight wiki. Or will we have to move towards static pages?
sent from handheld device excuse typos On Apr 7, 2011 8:18 PM, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> wrote: > It's fine to promote the wiki on the home page *as a wiki*. It's not > fine to have things like the 'mailing list' page be linked into the > wiki. > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: >> Having the wiki promoted on the homepage, has help us a lot in terms of >> organizing content and help pages from volunteers and also reduced the >> burden of keeping content checked into the svn like its 2000s . Confluence >> exporter always broke the formatting of the current Wiki page. I haven't >> tried the revamped exporter, maybe it will help, but I am not sure(since a >> lot of funky hacking was done to make Wiki look like the mahout home page) >> Robin >> >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Infra says that the the CPU load of having users hit confluence as the >>> web site is unacceptable to them. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Its not done anywhere else, so it might be unpopular. >>> > But, is there a real problem in doing that? Security wise? Infra wise? >>> > Robin >>> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Benson Margulies < [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Unless I'm more confused than usual, we're exposing the confluence >>> >> instance in links on our front page. This is very very unpopular with >>> >> the infra team. (The front page itself is a static html pages, but >>> >> many of the links on it point to cwiki). Infra has their internal CMS. >>> >> An alternative is to use Dan Kulp's revamped confluence exporter. But >>> >> I think we have to do something. >>> > >>> > >> >>
