We should setup a Jenkins job to run the examples on a regular basis and to validate the output. I've been doing some Jenkins work lately, I will see if I can get to it after Revolution.
-Grant On May 20, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > Looks like Grant got a fix posted? Has anyone else tried it? > > -jake > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think we definitely need to figure out whether it's a bug or some other >> confusion. If it's a doesn't-work-at-all bug yes probably the kind of thing >> that needs a fix ASAP in which case write up all you know and everyone will >> pile in to look at it. >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is this an issue that should be fixed before we release? It seems to be >>> broken to me. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:05 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Is LDA Broken? >>> >>> I'm running build-reuters option 2 and the LDA runs to maxIterations (20) >>> without ever producing a non-zero Log Likelihood. This is not the >> behavior >>> that I recall from earlier runs and seems quite unlikely to be correct. >>> >>> >>
