On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Hector Yee <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was concerned about classifyScalar because it enforces the contract that > the scores be in the 0..1 range. There doesn't seem to be a function that > returns the raw score for the scalar case. > Yes. There should be. The only reason that there isn't is that there had not been any users of this yet. > ... > I was proposing that we have all classifiers support classifyNoLink as > well, > especially for the case of non-probabilistic based ones where reducing > scores to probabilities would be bad. > Why? This is the part that I don't understand. Why force this implementation?
