[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13162251#comment-13162251
 ] 

Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-913:
----------------------------------

We do have mvn checkstyle available; I think it still works, is pretty well 
configured, and outputs and HTML report. FindBugs is hooked up too. I hesitate 
to fail a compile on warnings, but you could fail a commit. And really it would 
have to be *new* warnings. And some provision for exceptions. And I don't know 
how to do that with checkstyle, or if it's possible. Even I'm not worried about 
that yet.

Honestly I just flip on the IntelliJ code inspections and tailor them a little 
bit. we have a config file around here; I could post mine. The nice thing is it 
can fix many of these things in one go once you're viewing the analysis report. 
Simple refactorings are of course available (like turning a public field into a 
private field + getters/setters, with corresponding code changes). Even before 
that it'll do nice things like grey out stuff that's unused. Additional plugins 
like Copyright can fix headers. Some search-and-replace with regexes does more. 
Some bits are manual. Eclipse does some of this but doesn't have the 
inspections.
                
> Style changes / discussion
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-913
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-913
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.5
>            Reporter: Sean Owen
>            Assignee: Sean Owen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-913.patch
>
>
> Guys I've still been seeing code committed that doesn't match standard Java 
> style or a reasonable policy I can imagine. I wanted to talk about it since 
> I've just been silently changing it and that is not ideal.
> This should be easy to get right, as automated tools exist to check and fix 
> this. I recommend IntelliJ's free Community edition. Flip on even basic 
> inspections. A hundred things will jump out (that are already jumping out at 
> me). Most are automatically fixable. 
> I think that standardized, readable code invites attention, work and care: it 
> feels like something you want to improve, and don't want to hack up.
> I think it helps attract committers. Strong engineering organizations 
> wouldn't let basic style problems in the codebase, just by using automated 
> checks. Code reviews don't begin otherwise, and then reviews focus on real 
> issues like design. We can make a basic effort to approach that level of 
> quality. Otherwise, people who are used to a higher standard won't be 
> inclined to participate in the project, and will just fork.
> I think it's a prerequisite to fixing real design issues, TODOs, correctness 
> problems (cloning for instance), and refactorings. This code is not near that 
> point, and won't get there at this rate. 
> Personally it makes we want to only support anything I've written, and write 
> any "next generation" recommender system in a new and separate venture. And 
> I'm a friendly, and maybe not the only one! So would be great to keep some 
> focus on quality and design.
> Here's a patch showing all the changes I've picked up and made with the IDE 
> -- *just* basic style issues, and just since the last 2 weeks. The issues 
> are, among others:
>       ⁃       Empty javadoc
>       ⁃       Redundant javadoc ("@param foo the foo")
>       ⁃       Missing copyright headers
>       ⁃       Copyright headers not at top of file (sometimes after imports!)
>       ⁃       Very long lines (>> 120 chars)
>       ⁃       "throws Exception" not on main() or test method
>       ⁃       "transient" fields -- should never be used for us
>       ⁃       Missing @Override
>       ⁃       Using new Random()
>       ⁃       Redundant boolean expressions like "foo == true"
>       ⁃       Unused variables and parameters
>       ⁃       Unused imports
>       ⁃       Loops and conditionals without braces
>       ⁃       Weird literals ("1d")

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to