[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13187883#comment-13187883
 ] 

Ikumasa Mukai commented on MAHOUT-945:
--------------------------------------

Hi wang-san.
Thank you for your detailed explanation.

It is the point that we must use the weighted average, right?

If I stick to use the total values for calc on your example,
the 1st split should be calced like 25.63-(16.6*11+19*1.1) and 
the 2nd split should be 25.63-(1.67*11+37.5*1.1).

Could I catch your suggestion?
                
> The variance calculation of Random forest regression tree
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-945
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Classification
>    Affects Versions: 0.6
>            Reporter: Wang Yue
>              Labels: Regressionsplit.java
>         Attachments: MAHOUT-945.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 48h
>  Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> Hi, Mukai
>   Thanks for your efforts in expand the RF to regression. However, I have a 
> doubt about your implementation regarding to Regressionsplit.java. The 
> variance method 
> "
>  private static double variance(double[] s, double[] ss, double[] dataSize) {
>     double var = 0;
>     for (int i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
>       if (dataSize[i] > 0) {
>         var += ss[i] - ((s[i] * s[i]) / dataSize[i]);
>       }
>     }
>     return var;
>   }
> "
> While the variance in my mind should be something like 
> var += ss[i]/dataSize[i] - ((s[i] * s[i]) / (dataSize[i]*dataSize[i]));
> Please help correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to