Hello Ted,

I would have to study the paper you ve given me first a little bit. What I
could do at the moment is a small adn easy overview over the model and
algorithm I am implementing... Deep Boltzmann Machines that I am using for
classification are artificial neural networks based on stacked restricted
boltzmann machines. I think the models are quite different on how they
exactly work since the model of the paper you wrote isn t an artificial
neural network or anything close at the first glance. Therefore it seems to
me that comparing the algorithms is quite difficult. If you still would
like a comparison, I will see what I can do.

regards
Dirk

2012/2/1 Ted Dunning <[email protected]>

> Dirk,
>
> Can you provide some comparison with RBM's and the Bayesian learning
> algorithm such as described here:
> http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=122779
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Dirk Weißenborn (Created) (JIRA) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Classifier based on restricted boltzmann machines
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: MAHOUT-968
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-968
> >             Project: Mahout
> >          Issue Type: New Feature
> >          Components: Classification
> >            Reporter: Dirk Weißenborn
> >
> >
> > This is a proposal for a new classifier based on restricted boltzmann
> > machines. The development of this feature follows the paper on "Deep
> > Boltzmann Machines" (DBM) [1] from 2009. The proposed model (DBM) got an
> > error rate of 0.95% on the mnist dataset [2], which is really good. Main
> > parts of the implementation should also be applicable to other scenarios
> > than classification where restricted boltzmann machines are used (ref.
> > MAHOUT-375).
> > I am working on this feature right now, and the results are promising.
> The
> > only problem with the training algorithm is, that it is still mostly
> > sequential (if training batches are small, what they should be), which
> > makes Map/Reduce until now, not really beneficial. However, since the
> > algorithm itself is fast (for a training algorithm), training can be done
> > on a single machine in managable time.
> > Testing of the algorithm is currently done on the mnist dataset itself to
> > reproduce results of [1]. As soon as results indicate, that everything is
> > working fine, I will upload the patch.
> >
> > [1] http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~hinton/absps/dbm.pdf
> > [2] http://yann.lecun.com/exdb/mnist/
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> > administrators:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> > For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to