On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > Jake's comment is to the point. > > The real difference between math and core is that core depends on hadoop > and math does not. That makes math much more widely useful. > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Jake Mannix > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > math should get anything not data-structurey which doesn't depend on > > Hadoop.
Note: should read "anything data-structurey" > > > > On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > > > I would rather see Pair moved to math. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Dan Filimon < > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > <javascript:;> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I fixed it by moving the classes I wanted into core rather than math. > > > > I moved WeightedVector and Centroid to core. > > > > > > > > I'm playing around with a patch for that vector refactoring peeve > [1]. > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Sean Owen > > > > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > core depends on math. I suppose the idea way back when was that > math > > > > > was core-core and should and could be separable. > > > > > You just need to depend on core (too). > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Dan Filimon < > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Specifically, I'm playing around with implementing a pet peeve > [1]. > > > > >> I can't access org.apache.mahout.common.Pair in mahout-math. > What's > > > > >> the simplest way of doing that? > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks! > > > > >> > > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -jake > > > -- -jake
