FWIW, the only way we are getting out of code freeze is if we actually get some 
feedback on the RC.  It passes my tests, but I haven't heard from others much.

-Grant

On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> meant, after code freeze is over.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> fixed as part of MAHOUT-1281 patch now. I will push after code freeze.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> Please file.  Looks completely innocuous and it is good to be standard.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Looks like Lanczos is having the same problem and need to undo some
>>>> workarounds :
>>>> 
>>>>    EigenDecomposition decomp = new EigenDecomposition(triDiag);
>>>> 
>>>>    Matrix eigenVects = decomp.getV();
>>>>    Vector eigenVals = decomp.getRealEigenvalues();
>>>>    endTime(TimingSection.TRIDIAG_DECOMP);
>>>>    startTime(TimingSection.FINAL_EIGEN_CREATE);
>>>>    for (int row = 0; row < i; row++) {
>>>>      Vector realEigen = null;
>>>>      // the eigenvectors live as columns of V, in reverse order.  Weird
>>>> but true.
>>>>      Vector ejCol = eigenVects.viewColumn(i - row - 1);
>>>>      int size = Math.min(ejCol.size(), state.getBasisSize());
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> changing line 329 of EigenDecomposition.java from
>>>>> 
>>>>>        if (d.getQuick(j) < p) {
>>>>> 
>>>>> to
>>>>>        if (d.getQuick(j) > p) {
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> makes my MAHOUT-1281 patch work.
>>>>> 
>>>>> should i keep the change? (question for Ted, i guess)
>>>>> 
>>>>> thanks.
>>>>> -D
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> It looks like values out of our ported EigenDecomposition are coming
>>> out
>>>>>> sorted in inverse order.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Shouldn't it be the other way around?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

--------------------------------------------
Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers
http://www.lucidworks.com





Reply via email to