On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:23:11 -0800 (PST) Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Below are the Open issues for 0.9:-
This looks like we should be targeting Dec. 9th as code freeze to me. What do you all think? > Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - All > related to Wiki updates, missing Wiki documentation and Wiki > migration to new CMS. Isabel's working on M-1245 (migrating to new > CMS). Could some of the others be consolidated with that? I believe MAHOUT-1245 essentially is ready to be published - all I want before notifying INFRA to switch to the new cms based site is one other person to take at least a brief look. For MAHOUT-1304 - Sebastian, can you please check that the cms based site actually does fit on 1280px? We can close this issue then. MAHOUT-1305 - I think this should be turned into a task to actually delete most of the pages that have been migrated to the new CMS (almost all of them). Once 1245 is shipped, it would be great if a few more people could lend a hand in getting this done. MAHOUT-1307 - Can be closed once switched to CMS MAHOUT-1326 - This really relates to the old Confluence export plugin we once have been using to generate static pages out of our wiki that is no longer active. Unless anyone on the Mahout dev list knows how to fully delete all exported static pages we should file an issue with INFRA to ask for help getting those deleted. They definitely are confusing to users. > M-1286 - Peng and ssc, we had talked about this during the last > hangout. Can this be included in 0.9? > > M-1030 - Andrew Musselman? Any updates on this, its important that we > fix this for 0.9 > > M-1319, M-1328, > M-1347, M-1364 - Suneel > > M-1273 - Kun Yung, remember talking about this in one of the earlier > hangouts; can't recall what was decided? > > M-1312, M-1256 - Dan Filimon (or Stevo??) > > M-996 someone could pick this up (if its still relevant with present > codebase i.e.) I think this can move to the next release - according to the contributor and Sebastian the patch is rather hacky and there for illustration purposes only. I'd rather see some more thought go into that instead of pushing to have this in 0.9. > M-1265 Yexi had submitted a patch for this, it would be good if this > could go in as part of 0.9 > > M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell > > M-1285: Any takers for this? Would be nice to have - in particular if someone on dev@ (not necessarily a committer) wants to get started with the code base. Otherwise I'd say fix for next release if time gets short. > M-1356: Isabel's started on this, Stevo could u review this? We definitely can punt that for the next release or even thereafter. It would be great if someone who has some knowledge of Java security policies would take a look. The implication of not fixing this essentially is that in case someone commits test code that writes outside of target or to some globally shared directory we might end up having randomly failing tests due to the parallel setup again. But as these will occur shortly after the commit it should be easy enough to find the code change that caused the breakage. > M-1329: Support for Hadoop 2 Is that truly feasable within a week? > M-1366: Stevo, Isabel ???? This should be done as part of the release process by release manager at the latest. > M-1261: Sebastian??? > > M-1309, M-1310, M-1311, M-1316 - all related to running Mahout on > Windows ?? I'm not aware of us supporting Windows. > M-1350 - Any takers?? (Stevo??) To me this looks like a broken classpath on the user side. Without a patch to at least re-produce the issue I wouldn't spend too much time on this. Isabel
