+1 for 1.0. This is more challenging than expected (the old hadoop 0.23 profile support is misleading)
Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 19, 2013, at 19:48, Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > +1 > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Frank Scholten <fr...@frankscholten.nl> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I am looking at M-1329 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) as we speak. This change >>> requires quite some testing and I prefer to push this to 1.0. I am >> thinking >>> of creating a unit test that starts miniclusters for each versions and >> runs >>> a job in them. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> There's M-1329 that covers this. Hopefully it should make it for 0.9 >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Isabel Drost-Fromm <isa...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 23:16:36 +0200 >>>>> Gokhan Capan <gkhn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> M-1354 (Support for Hadoop 2.x) - Patch available. >>>>>>> Gokhan, any updates on this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope, still couldn't make it work. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Should we push that for 1.0 then (if this is shortly before completion >>>>> and there's too much in 1.0 to push for a release early next year, I'd >>>>> also be happy to have a smaller release between now and Berlin >>>>> Buzzwords that includes the fix...). >>>>> >>>>> Isabel >>
