The release has passed with the required votes from PMC, will be pushing 0.9 to 
the mirrors and updating the release notes over the next day or two.




On Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:16 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
+1



On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> wrote:

> LGTM
>
>
> On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote:
>
>> +1, can't see a bad side.
>>
>> On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter <
>>> s...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  a), b), c), d) all passed here.
>>>>>
>>>>> CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh ->1 kmeans
>>>>> were
>>>>> within the range [0,1].
>>>>>
>>>>>  Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:45:42 -0800
>>>>>> From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
>>>>>> Subject: Mahout 0.9 Release
>>>>>> To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed the issues that were reported with Clustering code this past
>>>>>> week,
>>>>>>
>>>>> upgraded codebase to Lucene 4.6.1 that was released today.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the URL for the 0.9 release in staging:-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapachemahout-1004/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.9/
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The artifacts have been signed with the following key:
>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/smarthi.asc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please:-
>>>>>> a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip)
>>>>>> b) Verify u r able to compile the distro
>>>>>> c)  Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test
>>>>>> d) Run the example scripts under $MAHOUT_HOME/examples/bin. Please run
>>>>>>
>>>>> through all the different options in each script.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Need a minimum of 3 '+1' votes from PMC for the release to be
>>>>>> finalized.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to