To be clear, I meant what Ted said here. Mahout has some great stuff in it that I would love to see merged with H2O.
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:24 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> At least one of your users here reported it does not make sense to run >> Mahout on all this, and at least two of us have trouble seeing how such >> disassembly and reassembly might take place. What are your thoughts on >> this? >> How clearly you realize the reintegration roadmap? > > To clarify, what I heard the user say was that it doesn't make sense to run > Mahout instead of h2o as Mahout currently stands. > > That is very different from not making sense to run Mahout after changes to > use the virtues of h2o.
