On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > One thing that I would like to start now and that I think is consensus, > > (given that it was in the board report) is to rename the upcoming release > > to 0.10. We already stated in the board report that we "won't be > shipping a > > 1.0 release any time soon" > > > > Shout if you disagree, otherwise I will do the renaming end of the week. > > > > > I would consider having the next release be a big trim and calling it 1.0. > Then when we add substantial new capabilities, we can go straight to 2.0. > People have stated on public forums that 1.0 is in process, which is true even if we take time to clean/trim in a point release before launching 1.0. I will be happy with any version numbering plan if we continue to improve and make progress, while I lean toward cutting a 0.10 release in the next four months or so that includes lots more bugs filed and fixed along with what we have in the queue.
