I don't like profiles - they complicate things (imagine what release
process would look like, with proper versioning and tagging), and profiles
are not as transparent as other options.

I prefer using assembly per classifier, or having separate (sub)modules
with different dependencies. Then a release of all of the variants
(complete project) would be a single run, each would have clean classpath,
and we'd have easier to comprehend project structure.

Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> Regarding mechanics, the fact that we have profiles available to do the
> build already should make the process very simple ... roughly just adding
> -Phadoop2 or some such.  Internally, it is setting a few symbols and
> tweaking the dependencies slightly.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > +1 for something like that. Again, spark just makes tons of binary
> releases
> > bound to a specific flavor of H-1 or H-2 including CDH etc.
> >
> > Not sure if it is totally feasible with just build techniques (the
> > ubiquitous #ifdef macros immediately spring up in mind, something i am
> > totally not missing in java) but if it is, it is the way to go.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Gokhan Capan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > My vote would be releasing mahout with hadoop1 and hadoop2 classifiers
> > >
> > > Gokhan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Sebastian Schelter <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Big +1
> > > > Am 23.05.2014 15:33 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > > What do folks think about spinning out a new version of 0.9 that
> only
> > > > > changes which version of Hadoop the build uses?
> > > > >
> > > > > There have been quite a few questions lately on this topic.
> > > > >
> > > > > My suggestion would be that we use minor version numbering to
> > maintain
> > > > this
> > > > > and the normal 0.9 release simultaneously if we decide to do a bug
> > fix
> > > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to