[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14026831#comment-14026831
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1529:
----------------------------------------

Github user dlyubimov commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/15#issuecomment-45654741
  
    1529 is closed now. besides, it doesn't have anything to do with shell.
    
    it's fine this is a small change, i'll merge it without issue
    
    
    On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Anand Avati <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    
    > I assumed this is part of MAHOUT-1529 itself (which renamed @sc
    > <https://github.com/sc> to @sdc <https://github.com/sdc>). Let me
    > resubmit with MAHOUT-1529 in the commit message?
    >
    > —
    > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
    > <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/15#issuecomment-45653931>.
    >


> Finalize abstraction of distributed logical plans from backend operations
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MAHOUT-1529
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1529
>             Project: Mahout
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dmitriy Lyubimov
>            Assignee: Dmitriy Lyubimov
>             Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> We have a few situations when algorithm-facing API has Spark dependencies 
> creeping in. 
> In particular, we know of the following cases:
> -(1) checkpoint() accepts Spark constant StorageLevel directly;-
> -(2) certain things in CheckpointedDRM;-
> -(3) drmParallelize etc. routines in the "drm" and "sparkbindings" package.-
> -(5) drmBroadcast returns a Spark-specific Broadcast object-
> (6) Stratosphere/Flink conceptual api changes.
> *Current tracker:* PR #1 https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/1 - closed, 
> need new PR for remaining things once ready.
> *Pull requests are welcome*.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to