I took it Gokhan had objections himself, based on his comments. if we are talking about #62.
He also expressed concerns about computing GSGD but i suspect it can still be algebraically computed. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW Ted and Andrew have both expressed interest in the distributed > aggregation stuff. It sounds like we are agreeing that > non-algebra—computation method type things can be engine specific. > > So does anyone have an objection to Gokhan pushing his PR? > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > My thought was not to bring primitive engine specific aggregetors, > > combiners, etc. into math-scala. > > > > Yeah. +1. I would like to support that as an experiment, see where it goes. > Clearly some distributed use cases are simple enough while also pervasive > enough. > >
