a few typos

also thought drm times in-core is trivial, but i am not sure how in-core
times drm is handled now (never seemed to encounter the case). need
verification.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Looks good to me
>
> +1 to publish this
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo (JIRA) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >     [
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14497337#comment-14497337
> > ]
> >
> > Andrew Palumbo commented on MAHOUT-1683:
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > I've commited a page to the site for out-of-core DSL/DRM operations
> > without a link:
> >
> > http://mahout.apache.org/users/environment/out-of-core-reference.html
> >
> > I've intentionally left details about Algebraic Optimization.  I think
> > that deserves its own page.  There is little engine specific stuff except
> > at the bottom.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I'll publish a link from the site later
> > tonight.
> >
> > > Create a reference page for DSL linalg operators
> > > --------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >                 Key: MAHOUT-1683
> > >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1683
> > >             Project: Mahout
> > >          Issue Type: Documentation
> > >    Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> > >            Reporter: Andrew Palumbo
> > >            Assignee: Andrew Palumbo
> > >             Fix For: 0.11.0
> > >
> > >
> > > A simple reference page for explaining the DSL operators, creating a
> > matrix, parallelizing and saving the matrix, etc.   Basicaly copying all
> of
> > the code blocks  from sec 1.1 through 1.8,  sec 2.2 through 2.7 and sec
> 2.9
> > through 2.10 from:
> > >  http://mahout.apache.org/users/sparkbindings/ScalaSparkBindings.pdf
> > >  to the site with minimal explanation (for easy browsing).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> > (v6.3.4#6332)
> >
>

Reply via email to