On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> You seem to be proposing a new cut by frequency of item interaction, is > this correct? This is because the frequency is known before the multiply > and LLR. I assume the #2 cut is left in place? > Yes. but I didn't think it was new.
