That's three votes; agree to release this RC?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote:
> Built and tested src zip and tar all tests passed
>
> Ran through several options for each classification and clustering
> example script in pseudo-cluster mode using the src tar build without
> any unexpected incident.
>
> Tested the shell in pseudo-cluster mode.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 08/04/2015 12:23 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> > Built and Tested {src} * {zip,tar} and all tests pass
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Looks good on EMR with the 3.8 AMI, which contains Amazon's Hadoop
> 2.4-v5
> >> and Spark 1.3.1.
> >>
> >> All examples that worked in the 0.10 release still work, with breakage
> >> happening on the cluster-reuters option 1, like last time, which is
> still
> >> not a blocker in my view. Need to lose the random forest stuff in 11.1
> >> (recorded in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1759).
> >>
> >> +1 binding
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrew Musselman <
> >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Getting this error running classify-20newsgroups.sh #3 in distributed
> >> mode:
> >>> 15/08/03 18:27:09 INFO rdd.SequenceFileRDDFunctions: Saving as sequence
> >>> file of type (IntWritable,VectorWritable)
> >>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException:
> >>> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Class
> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found
> >>> at
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1927)
> >>> at
> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.JobConf.getOutputCommitter(JobConf.java:722)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions.saveAsHadoopFile(PairRDDFunctions.scala:948)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.spark.rdd.SequenceFileRDDFunctions.saveAsSequenceFile(SequenceFileRDDFunctions.scala:103)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings.drm.CheckpointedDrmSpark.dfsWrite(CheckpointedDrmSpark.scala:163)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.mahout.classifier.naivebayes.NBModel.dfsWrite(NBModel.scala:105)
> >>> at
> >>>
> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$.process(TrainNBDriver.scala:107)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$$anonfun$main$1.apply(TrainNBDriver.scala:77)
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$$anonfun$main$1.apply(TrainNBDriver.scala:75)
> >>> at scala.Option.map(Option.scala:145)
> >>> at
> org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver$.main(TrainNBDriver.scala:75)
> >>> at org.apache.mahout.drivers.TrainNBDriver.main(TrainNBDriver.scala)
> >>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> >>> Class org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found
> >>> at
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1895)
> >>> at
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1919)
> >>> ... 11 more
> >>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: Class
> >>> org.apache.hadoop.mapred.DirectFileOutputCommitter not found
> >>> at
> >>>
> >>
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClassByName(Configuration.java:1801)
> >>> at
> org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getClass(Configuration.java:1893)
> >>> ... 12 more
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sorry for confusion, I thought it was for all artifacts. Suneel
> >> clarified,
> >>>> it was just about not-merged change for distribution archives from
> >> 0.10.x
> >>>> to 0.11.x/master branch. Will verify releases and cast my vote later
> >>>> today.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kind regards,
> >>>> Stevo Slavic.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> Is this Apache wide? It’s silly if not. We shouldn’t make this
> >> decision
> >>>> in
> >>>>> a vacuum. Seems like the defacto standard is not to include “Apache"
> >> in
> >>>> the
> >>>>> artifact, I can’t think of anyone else who does.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:29 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> We made that change on 0.10.x branch but was not merged in master,
> >>>> that's
> >>>>> all that was there to be done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Otherwise I agree with what u r saying.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 4:48 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This keeps coming up often in recent releases, and I keep referring
> >> to
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1680 where it was
> >>>> decided
> >>>>> only
> >>>>>> to have distribution artifact/acrhive have "apache" prefix. Did
> >>>> something
> >>>>>> change since then?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> None of the Apache projects, java libraries, that I use, have apache
> >>>>> prefix
> >>>>>> in their artifact name. It's though part of their groupId.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If artifactId changes, people depending transitively and directly to
> >>>>> Mahout
> >>>>>> modules might get classpath issues - same class, two different
> >>>>>> versions/APIs, and depending on class loader different one may be
> >>>> loaded
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>> different context, or even fail to load.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>> Stevo Slavic.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Rolling back this release, there's a discrepancy in the artifact
> >>>> naming
> >>>>>>> that needs to be addressed; will send an update when a new Release
> >>>>>>> candidate is available.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This is the vote for release 0.11.0 of Apache Mahout.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
> >>>>>>>> Wednesday,
> >>>>>>>> August 5th, 2015. Please download, test and vote with
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release of Apache Mahout
> >>>>>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release of Apache
> >>>>> Mahout,
> >>>>>>>> because...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maven staging repo:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1012
> >>>>>>>> <
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1012/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.11.0/
> >>>>>>>> <
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebigtop-1001
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon is release-0.11.0
> >>>>>
> >>>
>
>
