I am +1 on the site absolutely. I suggest that we seperate the vote on the logo and the site.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> Date: 12/13/2017 09:47 (GMT-08:00) To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: New Website Due to 8 years of Ruby cruft I can’t get the Jeckyll site running without some major jackhammering. I can’t post a screenshot but here is the proposed logo. https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/mahout-1981/website/assets/mahout-logo.svg <https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/mahout-1981/website/assets/mahout-logo.svg> I encourage people to look at all of this and be judicious with -1s. This has been a lot of work, much of the design volunteered by folks at startbootstrap.com. IMO the design is awesome. It will put a good, modern, clean face on the new Mahout. The logo is a simple cube, not my favorite but I’m not going to -1 my favorite was the M/infinity symbol. If the logo is meant to be a hypercube there are simple ways to illustrate it like some form of this: https://sarcasticresonance.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/cubes1.png?w=721&zoom=2 <https://sarcasticresonance.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/cubes1.png?w=721&zoom=2> On Dec 6, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: Since you’ve already built it can you share a screen shot? The mockup I saw on Slack looked awesome. Also a logo change is a lot more far reaching so can we have at least a little discussion? On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: +1, looks great On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > The new website is available by checking out the mahout-1981 branch. > > If anyone interested wants to help do QA on it- > > > Follow these instructions > https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/mahout-1981/ > website/developers/how-to-update-the-website.md > > The only difference is, until we merge- you need to checkout mahout-1981 to > see the new site. > > I've been working on getting all of the links working /etc. > > Would like to plan on launching Monday, if no objections. That gives > everyone a chance have a look. > > Also, even if a typo or broken link slips through- updating the website is > easier than ever for committers and contributors alike (after we launch the > new site). One simply opens a PR against master, and then when merged, the > site automatically updates! > > Thanks, > tg >