Awesome, thanks for the feedback. I don't think we need a vote but we can leave it up to the buildmaster to decide :)
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 6:27 AM Trevor Grant <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for delayed reply. I like simply dropping the 0. from the front more > bc it is consistent and we are simply following an arbitrary directive to > move out of 0. land. > > a 1.0 release in my mind should be some major milestone which I don't think > we really did. > > Just my .02 > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I am ok with 1.0 > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:10 PM Andrew Musselman < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We've been discussing moving to a 1.0 release for a few years now. This > > > past quarter we had a comment on our board report about whether we > would > > > consider getting out of the 0.x releases. > > > > > > I think it makes sense especially since we've had major overhauls a > > > couple/few times now, which is one sign of a matured project. > > > > > > Instead of moving to 1.0, however, I would like to propose moving to > 14.1 > > > for our next release. This would recognize that for several years the > > > project has been ready to use, while keeping a similar historical > release > > > ordering. > > > > > > Any thoughts on moving to that numbering scheme? Further releases could > > > increment the minor version and have hot fixes in point releases, or we > > > could just increment the major version for a yearly release, say. > > > > > >
