I think it's great to get all these proposals in line; I'll be reviewing
your pull request for the binary/source release fix so we can get that out
ASAP.

Thanks all!

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 6:42 PM Apache Mahout <mahout.sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fair enough... I had no intention of getting into release planning. Please
> disregard what I'd said about releases.
>
> These were Just proposals and a vague direction that I'd had ideas for.
> Also these are all things that we've talked about. I was looking at when I
> could get possibly get to work on them.
>
> Most important is the PR
>
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 01:18:52 -0600, dev wrote:
>
> Like, Im not doing enough atm to fight the do-acracy, but calling 3
> releases out seems ambitious.
>
> I think everything you're saying is cool for roadmap, but trying to pin to
> specific releases atm is at best premature.
>
> Again, nothing but respect for the awesome job you've done @apalumbo.
>
> Just my .02, and don't mean to pee in the Cheerios,
>
> Tg
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019, 10:42 PM GitBox <g...@apache.org wrote:
>
> andrewpalumbo commented on issue #382: [MAHOUT-2071] Fix binary and source
> releases URL:
> https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/382#issuecomment-552162406
>
> As well if you guys are busy, i can assume lazy consensus after 72hr on a
> large PR if you like.
> 1.
>
> IMHO thw main goal for 14.1-release is to get binaries deployed as is. `
> 2.
>
> 14.2-release` maybe get zeppelin notebooks up and some provisioning
> software/AMI/DockerImages up online as discussed. (ivve started
> adrewpalumbo/mahout in Dockerhub btw.
> 3.
>
> 14.3-release, some demos and some GPU, multi-gpu for Viennacl openCL and
> Finishout some simple tiling strategy for multiGPU on JCuda branch if this
> is still the best Java/Cuda Blas overlap that we work on. Thats just of.
> the top of my head a path I'm just throwing it out there... All that to
> say. that if you guhys want to give me your proxyies for PRs, I'll het us
> ip to a voteable RC for this release. (14.1-release).. LMK---I dont mind
> either way. Just have a little more energy and time that i thought id have
> this week.
>
>
>
> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the
> message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the
> specific comment.
>
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> us...@infra.apache.org
>
> With regards, Apache Git Services
>

Reply via email to