Hi Folks,

so I've now tested the build with java 1.8, 9, 10 and they work ... 
11 I'm getting errors about unsupported java major versions again ... 
guess there's some old library version in there somewhere. 

But at least I managed to get you out of this 1.7 trap.

Chris


Am 20.04.20, 09:46 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:

    Hi folks,

    so I was now able to build (including all tests) with Java 8 and 9 ... 
currently trying 10 ... 

    Are there any objection that some maven dependencies get updated to more 
recent versions? I mean ... the hbase-client you're using is more than 5 years 
old ...

    Chris


    Am 20.04.20, 00:29 schrieb "Andrew Musselman" <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>:

        No problem; would 10:00 a.m. Pacific next Friday the 24th work for you 
time
        zone-wise?

        On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:15 PM Christofer Dutz 
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        wrote:

        > Sorry ...
        >
        > didn't see your response ... into Mahout too deep ;-)
        > Guess we have to postpone this to sometime over the week.
        >
        > Chris
        >
        >
        > Am 19.04.20, 19:56 schrieb "Andrew Musselman" 
<andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
        > >:
        >
        >     *what time
        >
        >     On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:51 Andrew Musselman <
        > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
        >     wrote:
        >
        >     > I think it's safe to move to 1.8; yeah what tune is good for 
you?
        > I'm in
        >     > Pacific time zone and am flexible this afternoon.
        >     >
        >     > Trevor you free?
        >     >
        >     > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:37 Christofer Dutz <
        > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     > wrote:
        >     >
        >     >> Yikes! ... well guess then I can't help you folks as it's 
almost
        >     >> impossible to get my hands on a 1.7 version.
        >     >>
        >     >> What's preventing you from going to 1.8+?
        >     >>
        >     >> Any your build says 1.8 and above:
        >     >>         <requireJavaVersion>
        >     >>                   <version>[1.8,)</version>
        >     >>                 </requireJavaVersion>
        >     >>
        >     >> Regarding the artifacts ... would it be ok to have the maven
        > artifacts
        >     >> using classifiers and perhaps the files in the libs and
        > distribution to
        >     >> follow the typical scala sheme?
        >     >>
        >     >> Chris
        >     >>
        >     >> Am 19.04.20, 17:56 schrieb "Trevor Grant" 
<trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com
        > >:
        >     >>
        >     >>     Yea, we have a requirement on 1.7. we need to get it up to 
8,
        > but
        >     >>     considered that a different issue.
        >     >>
        >     >>     Maven throws warning, sbt breaks down entirely (when 
importing)-
        >     >> hence why
        >     >>     we were using a script to replace 2.11 w 2.12
        >     >>
        >     >>     On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 10:33 AM Christofer Dutz <
        >     >> christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     >>     wrote:
        >     >>
        >     >>     > Well I have been compiling with various jdks from 8 to 
14.
        > However I
        >     >>     > noticed that if I select a jdk and start the build that 
the
        > Scala
        >     >> parts
        >     >>     > Seefahrt to the version in my systems path. Which then
        > results in
        >     >> all sorts
        >     >>     > of major version problems.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > For the Scalatest plugin I managed to have it use the 
maven
        >     >> java.home...
        >     >>     > The Scala compiler is being a little trickyer.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > Will continue this evening. Keep your fingers crossed.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > Also does maven totally not like variables in 
artifactids.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > Chris
        >     >>     > ________________________________
        >     >>     > Von: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
        >     >>     > Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. April 2020 15:41
        >     >>     > An: Mahout Dev List <dev@mahout.apache.org>
        >     >>     > Betreff: Re: Hi ... need some help?
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > Hey Chris,
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > First of all- thank you so much for your work so far.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > The build 100% currently works, the only issue is with
        > releasing
        >     >> binaries.
        >     >>     > Are you compiling w 1.7? Not really sure why artifact 
IDs are
        >     >> changing?
        >     >>     > That's very strange.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > To answer your question regarding the community block- 
no, it
        > is
        >     >> not as if
        >     >>     > there is a company that pays us to work on Mahout and the
        > rest is
        >     >>     > community. What it means is that while we appreciate 
those
        > code
        >     >>     > contributions, no one still actively involved is 
maintaining
        > them
        >     >> and we
        >     >>     > advise people to use at their own risk. The refactor to a
        >     >> `community`
        >     >>     > folder was meant to reflect the reality of the situation.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > The only test issues I was aware of were with Javadocs 
when
        > trying
        >     >> to do a
        >     >>     > release with Java 1.8+ those would fail due to 
formatting.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > I feel like you're hitting some unique issues, and maybe 
we
        > could
        >     >> help you
        >     >>     > out / there may exist simple solutions.
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > Thank you again for your help!
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > tg
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:17 AM Christofer Dutz <
        >     >> christofer.d...@c-ware.de
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > wrote:
        >     >>     >
        >     >>     > > Hi folks,
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > So yesterday I invested several hours in cleaning up 
your
        > build.
        >     >> I got
        >     >>     > > quite far, currently trying to get the tests to pass. 
For
        > some
        >     >>     > > Scala-Java-major-version problems, but working on 
fixing
        > them.
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > However sind things will be different. I hope that's 
OK.
        >     >> Especially with
        >     >>     > > the artifact ids.
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > Just as a question: does the build currently work at 
all?
        >     >> Especially in
        >     >>     > > the community block I had to fix quite a few API 
changes
        > where
        >     >> the code
        >     >>     > in
        >     >>     > > the blocks were for older versions of libraries.
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > I hope I get some more tests to pass today.
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > Chris
        >     >>     > > ________________________________
        >     >>     > > Von: Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org>
        >     >>     > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. April 2020 20:35
        >     >>     > > An: Mahout Dev List <dev@mahout.apache.org>
        >     >>     > > Betreff: Re: Hi ... need some help?
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > Looking forward to working on this with you; thanks 
again!
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 11:09 AM Christofer Dutz <
        >     >>     > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     >>     > > wrote:
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     > > > Hi Andrew,
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > > guess I'll start with the fork and contact you folks 
on
        > slack.
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > > Chris
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > > Am 16.04.20, 19:43 schrieb "Andrew Musselman" <
        > a...@apache.org>:
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     Chris, thank you for your help..
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     Yeah if you fork what's in master you can see 
what
        > state
        >     >> it's in;
        >     >>     > we
        >     >>     > > > are in
        >     >>     > > >     the #mahout channel in tge-asf slack and this is 
also
        > a
        >     >> fine way to
        >     >>     > > > keep
        >     >>     > > >     track of discussion.
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     We could file a JIRA ticket as well, however you
        > prefer to
        >     >> work.
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     Best
        >     >>     > > >     Andrew
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:59 Christofer Dutz <
        >     >>     > > > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     >>     > > >     wrote:
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >     > Hi Trevor,
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > ok ... first of all ... the Mahout PMC is 
defining a
        >     >> "community
        >     >>     > > >     > maintained" library which is not maintained by 
the
        > mahout
        >     >> PMC?!?!
        >     >>     > > >     > I thought at Apache everything is about 
Community
        > over
        >     >> code. So
        >     >>     > is
        >     >>     > > a
        >     >>     > > >     > company driving the non-community stuff?
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > But back to your build issues:
        >     >>     > > >     > I had a look and I too encountered these 
comments
        > and
        >     >> remarks and
        >     >>     > > >     > sometimes patterns I recognized and could 
imagine
        > why
        >     >> they were
        >     >>     > > > created.
        >     >>     > > >     > Yes quite a bit of the build could be cleaned 
up and
        >     >> simplified a
        >     >>     > > > lot.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > So how about I create a fork and try to do a
        > cleanup of
        >     >> the
        >     >>     > build.
        >     >>     > > >     > Usually I also leave comments about what I do 
as I
        > hope
        >     >> I'll not
        >     >>     > be
        >     >>     > > > the
        >     >>     > > >     > only one maintaining a build and documenting 
things
        > helps
        >     >> people
        >     >>     > > > feel more
        >     >>     > > >     > confident.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > However in some cases I will have questions 
... so
        > would
        >     >> someone
        >     >>     > be
        >     >>     > > >     > available on Slack for quick questions?
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > Usually switching to another build system does
        > solve some
        >     >>     > problems
        >     >>     > > > ...
        >     >>     > > >     > mostly the reason to switch is that it solved 
the
        > main
        >     >> problem
        >     >>     > that
        >     >>     > > > you are
        >     >>     > > >     > having with the old.
        >     >>     > > >     > However you usually notice too late that you 
get
        > yourself
        >     >> a lot
        >     >>     > of
        >     >>     > > > new
        >     >>     > > >     > problems. I remember doing some contract work 
for an
        >     >> insurance
        >     >>     > > > company and
        >     >>     > > >     > they were totally down Maven-road but then had 
to
        > build
        >     >> something
        >     >>     > > > with SBT
        >     >>     > > >     > ... in the end I compiled the thing on my 
laptop,
        > copied
        >     >> it to a
        >     >>     > > USB
        >     >>     > > > stick
        >     >>     > > >     > and told the people what was on the stick and 
that
        > I'll be
        >     >>     > having a
        >     >>     > > > coffee
        >     >>     > > >     > and will be back in 30 minutes. When I came 
back
        > the sick
        >     >> wasn't
        >     >>     > at
        >     >>     > > > the
        >     >>     > > >     > same place and the build problem was "solved" 
;-)
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > So I think it's quite good to stick to maven 
...
        > that is
        >     >> very
        >     >>     > > > mature, you
        >     >>     > > >     > can do almost everything you want with it and 
it
        >     >> integrates
        >     >>     > > > perfectly into
        >     >>     > > >     > the Apache infrastructure.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > But that's just my opinion.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > So if you want me to help, I'll be happy to be 
of
        >     >> assistance.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > Chris
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     > Am 16.04.20, 15:28 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <
        >     >>     > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com
        >     >>     > > > >:
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     Hey Christopher,
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     I would agree with what Stevo outlined but 
add
        > some
        >     >> more
        >     >>     > > context
        >     >>     > > > and a
        >     >>     > > >     >     couple related JIRA issues.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     For 0.14.0 We did a big refactor and 
finally
        > moved the
        >     >>     > > MapReduce
        >     >>     > > > based
        >     >>     > > >     >     Mahout all into what we called "community/"
        > that is
        >     >> community
        >     >>     > > >     > maintained,
        >     >>     > > >     >     which is to say, we're not maintaining it
        > anymore
        >     >> (sunset
        >     >>     > > began I
        >     >>     > > >     > think in
        >     >>     > > >     >     2015).
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     But all of our POMs were so huge and fat 
because
        >     >> they'd been
        >     >>     > > > layered up
        >     >>     > > >     >     over the years by people coming and going 
and
        >     >> dropping in
        >     >>     > > code. I
        >     >>     > > >     > wouldn't
        >     >>     > > >     >     call these drive- bys, its just been over 
10
        > years
        >     >> and people
        >     >>     > > > come and
        >     >>     > > >     > go.
        >     >>     > > >     >     Such is the life of Apache Projects. So we 
had a
        >     >> situation
        >     >>     > > where
        >     >>     > > > a lot
        >     >>     > > >     > of
        >     >>     > > >     >     the old Map Reduce stuff and the POMs were
        > considered
        >     >>     > > > "old-magic" no
        >     >>     > > >     > one
        >     >>     > > >     >     really knew how it was all tied together, 
but we
        >     >> didn't want
        >     >>     > to
        >     >>     > > > mess
        >     >>     > > >     > with
        >     >>     > > >     >     it for fear of breaking something in the 
"new"
        > Mahout
        >     >> (aka
        >     >>     > > > Samsar)
        >     >>     > > >     > which is
        >     >>     > > >     >     the Scala/Spark based library that it is 
now*
        > (to
        >     >> others in
        >     >>     > the
        >     >>     > > >     > community:
        >     >>     > > >     >     I know it runs on other engines, but for
        > simplicity,
        >     >> I'm just
        >     >>     > > > calling
        >     >>     > > >     > it
        >     >>     > > >     >     "runs-on-spark").
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     For 0.14.0 We decided to trim out as much 
of
        > that
        >     >> which was
        >     >>     > > > possible.
        >     >>     > > >     > We
        >     >>     > > >     >     did some major liposuction on POMs, re 
organized
        >     >> things, etc.
        >     >>     > > > This was
        >     >>     > > >     > done
        >     >>     > > >     >     by commenting out a section, then seeing 
if it
        > would
        >     >> still
        >     >>     > > > build. So
        >     >>     > > >     > the
        >     >>     > > >     >     current release
        >     >>     > > >     >     _does_ build. And aside for some CLI driver
        > issues
        >     >> which are
        >     >>     > > > outlined
        >     >>     > > >     > in
        >     >>     > > >     >     [1], the project runs fairly smooth. (An 
SBT
        > would
        >     >> probably
        >     >>     > > > solve [1],
        >     >>     > > >     > I
        >     >>     > > >     >     believe Pat Ferrel has made his own SBT 
script
        > to
        >     >> compile
        >     >>     > > > Mahout, which
        >     >>     > > >     >     solved that problem for them).
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     The issue we ran into with the releases 
(and the
        >     >> reason I
        >     >>     > think
        >     >>     > > > you're
        >     >>     > > >     >     here), is that we also somewhere along the 
line
        >     >> commented out
        >     >>     > > > something
        >     >>     > > >     >     that was important to the release process.
        > Hence why
        >     >> 0.14.0
        >     >>     > > > released
        >     >>     > > >     > source
        >     >>     > > >     >     only.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     Since 2008, there has been a lot of great 
work
        > on
        >     >> generating
        >     >>     > > > plugins
        >     >>     > > >     > for
        >     >>     > > >     >     doing Apache releases. Instead of the 
awkward
        > hacks
        >     >> that made
        >     >>     > > up
        >     >>     > > > the
        >     >>     > > >     > old
        >     >>     > > >     >     poms (literally comments that said, "this 
is a
        > hack,
        >     >> there's
        >     >>     > > > supposedly
        >     >>     > > >     >     something better coming from ..." dated 
like
        > 2012),
        >     >> we would
        >     >>     > > > like to
        >     >>     > > >     > do it
        >     >>     > > >     >     the "right way" and incorporate the 
appropriate
        >     >> plugins.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     Refactoring to SBT was _one_ proposed 
solution.
        > We're
        >     >> also OK
        >     >>     > > >     > continuing to
        >     >>     > > >     >     use Maven, and I agree with what you said 
about
        > the
        >     >> cross
        >     >>     > > > compiling. We
        >     >>     > > >     >     actually have a script that just changes 
the
        > scala
        >     >> version.
        >     >>     > We
        >     >>     > > > tried
        >     >>     > > >     > using
        >     >>     > > >     >     the classifiers but there were issues in 
SBT,
        > but the
        >     >> way
        >     >>     > > you're
        >     >>     > > >     > proposing
        >     >>     > > >     >     sounds a lot more pro than the route we 
were
        > trying
        >     >> for.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     That said- we'd be OK just releasing one
        > scala/spark
        >     >> version
        >     >>     > at
        >     >>     > > > a time.
        >     >>     > > >     >     But getting the convenience binaries to
        >     >> release/publish would
        >     >>     > > be
        >     >>     > > > a
        >     >>     > > >     > major
        >     >>     > > >     >     first step.
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     Also, we really appreciate the help,
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     tg
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     [1]
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     >
        >     >>
        > 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MAHOUT/issues/MAHOUT-2093?filter=allopenissues
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:50 AM Christofer 
Dutz
        > <
        >     >>     > > >     > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     >>     > > >     >     wrote:
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Hi Stevo,
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > so let me summarize what I understood:
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - There are some modules in mahout that 
are
        > built
        >     >> with
        >     >>     > Scala,
        >     >>     > > > some
        >     >>     > > >     > with
        >     >>     > > >     >     > java and some with both (At least that's 
what
        > I see
        >     >> when
        >     >>     > > > checking
        >     >>     > > >     > out the
        >     >>     > > >     >     > project)
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - The current build uses Scala 2.11 to 
build
        > the
        >     >> Scala
        >     >>     > code.
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - The resulting libraries are only 
compatible
        > with
        >     >> Scala
        >     >>     > 2.11
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Now you want to also publish versions
        > compatible
        >     >> with Scala
        >     >>     > > > 2.12?
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > If that's the case I think Maven could 
easily
        > add
        >     >> multiple
        >     >>     > > > executions
        >     >>     > > >     >     > where each compile compiles to different
        > output
        >     >>     > directories:
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - Java --> target/classes
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - Scala 2.11 --> target/classes-2.11
        >     >>     > > >     >     > - Scala 2.12 --> target/classes-2.12
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Then the packaging would also need a 
second
        >     >> execution ...
        >     >>     > > each
        >     >>     > > > of the
        >     >>     > > >     >     > executions bundling the classes and the
        >     >> corresponding scala
        >     >>     > > > output.
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Ideally I would probably use maven
        > classifiers to
        >     >>     > distinguish
        >     >>     > > > the
        >     >>     > > >     >     > artifacts.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > <dependency>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     <groupId>org.apache.mahout</groupId>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     <artifactId>mahout-spark</artifactId>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     <version>14.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     <classifier>2.11</classifier>
        >     >>     > > >     >     > </dependency>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Then it should all work in a normal maven
        > build. In
        >     >> the
        >     >>     > > >     > distributions you
        >     >>     > > >     >     > could also filter the versions according 
to
        > their
        >     >>     > > classifiers.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > So if this is the case, I could help you 
with
        > this.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Chris
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     > Am 16.04.20, 09:39 schrieb "Stevo 
Slavić" <
        >     >>     > ssla...@gmail.com
        >     >>     > > >:
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     Disclaimer: I'm not active Mahout
        > maintainer
        >     >> for quite
        >     >>     > a
        >     >>     > > > while,
        >     >>     > > >     > have
        >     >>     > > >     >     > some
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     historical perspective, take it with 
a
        > grain of
        >     >> salt,
        >     >>     > > > could be
        >     >>     > > >     > I'm
        >     >>     > > >     >     > missing
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     the whole point you were approached 
for
        > by a
        >     >> wide
        >     >>     > margin
        >     >>     > > of
        >     >>     > > >     > error.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     At a point Mahout, some of its 
modules,
        > have
        >     >> turned
        >     >>     > into
        >     >>     > > a
        >     >>     > > > scala
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     library, and there was need to cross
        > publish
        >     >> those
        >     >>     > > modules,
        >     >>     > > >     > across
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     different scala versions. Back than 
Maven
        > scala
        >     >> plugin
        >     >>     > > > didn't
        >     >>     > > >     > support
        >     >>     > > >     >     > cross
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     publishing, it doesn't fit well with
        > Maven's
        >     >> build
        >     >>     > > > lifecycle
        >     >>     > > >     > concept
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     (multiple compile phases - one for 
each
        > scala
        >     >> version,
        >     >>     > > and
        >     >>     > > > what
        >     >>     > > >     > not
        >     >>     > > >     >     > would
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     be needed). Switching to sbt could 
have
        > solved
        >     >> the
        >     >>     > > problem.
        >     >>     > > >     > Switch was
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     deemed to be too big task, even 
though
        > ages
        >     >> have been
        >     >>     > > > spent on
        >     >>     > > >     > trying
        >     >>     > > >     >     > to
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     apply Maven (profiles) + bash 
scripts and
        > what
        >     >> not to
        >     >>     > > > solve the
        >     >>     > > >     >     > problem.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     Trying to apply same approach over 
and
        > over
        >     >> again and
        >     >>     > > > expecting
        >     >>     > > >     >     > different
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     results is not smart, no expert can 
help
        > there.
        >     >> Mahout
        >     >>     > > >     > maintainers and
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     contributors, should consider 
alternative
        >     >> approach, one
        >     >>     > > of
        >     >>     > > > them
        >     >>     > > >     > being
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     switching to sbt - it's scala native,
        > supports
        >     >> scala
        >     >>     > > cross
        >     >>     > > >     > publishing,
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     supports publishing Maven compatible
        > release
        >     >> metadata
        >     >>     > and
        >     >>     > > >     > binaries.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     Kind regards,
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     Stevo Slavic.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:15 AM
        > Christofer Dutz
        >     >> <
        >     >>     > > >     >     > christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     wrote:
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > Hi folks,
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > my name is Chris and I’m involved 
in
        > quite a
        >     >> lot of
        >     >>     > > > Apache
        >     >>     > > >     > projects.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > Justin approached me this morning,
        > asking me
        >     >> if I
        >     >>     > could
        >     >>     > > >     > perhaps help
        >     >>     > > >     >     > you.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > He told me you were having trouble 
with
        > doing
        >     >> Maven
        >     >>     > > > releases.
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > As Maven releases are my specialty,
        > could you
        >     >> please
        >     >>     > > > summarize
        >     >>     > > >     > the
        >     >>     > > >     >     > issues
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > you are having?
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     > Chris
        >     >>     > > >     >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >     >
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > > >
        >     >>     > >
        >     >>     >
        >     >>
        >     >>
        >
        >


Reply via email to