Re: NPE at PipelineSpecificationWithVersions

[Rafa Haro]

Hi Karl,

Thanks for your quick response as always ;-). I have updated my local copy
today and made a clean build. Anyway, I will check the revision to ensure I
have those changes, but I'm almost sure I'm on last version of the trunk.

Thanks,
Rafa

On Monday, August 4, 2014, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Rafa,
>
> I fixed a bug in this method not long ago (r1612102).  Have you svn updated
> lately?
>
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > I’m testing a new connector and I’m continuously getting a Null Pointer
> > Exception in the same class. The whole trace inside Manifold is the
> > following:
> >
> > at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.PipelineSpecificationWithVersions.getStatus(PipelineSpecificationWithVersions.java:53)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.PipelineSpecificationWithVersions.getOutputDocumentVersionString(PipelineSpecificationWithVersions.java:66)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.agents.incrementalingest.IncrementalIngester$PipelineObjectWithVersions.buildAddPipeline(IncrementalIngester.java:2746)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.agents.incrementalingest.IncrementalIngester$PipelineObjectWithVersions.addOrReplaceDocumentWithException(IncrementalIngester.java:2711)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.agents.incrementalingest.IncrementalIngester.documentIngest(IncrementalIngester.java:781)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.WorkerThread$ProcessActivity.ingestDocumentWithException(WorkerThread.java:1600)
> >         at
> >
> org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.WorkerThread$ProcessActivity.ingestDocumentWithException(WorkerThread.java:1554)
> >
> > The call to the ingestDocumentWithException method is correct and all the
> > parameters are not null and well formed:
> >
> > activities.ingestDocumentWithException(String.valueOf(uuid), "", uuid,
> rd);
> >
> > The version of the document is intentionally empty. Any clue about how
> > could this happening?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rafa
>