[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14148966#comment-14148966
 ] 

Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-345:
----------------------------------------

Hi Abe-san,

For the single-process example, since there is no external communication with 
the process, the only way to shut it down is to kill it, as you have 
implemented above.  I don't see how your suggestion would change that in any 
way?

As for your comment that people may not want to configure jetty, I think we can 
assume that they do.  You also, though, seem to imply that people might want to 
use Tomcat for the single-process example.  That seems to me to be unlikely, 
since (as you point out) we have a combined war for exactly that purpose.  The 
reason we ship jetty at all is because (a) it makes a very easy example, and 
(b) we use it in tests.


> Jetty Configuration Support
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONNECTORS-345
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-345
>             Project: ManifoldCF
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Framework core
>    Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.4
>         Environment: Jetty Configuration
>            Reporter: Michael J. Kelleher
>            Assignee: Karl Wright
>             Fix For: ManifoldCF 2.0
>
>
> Can the single process example be extended to support Jetty configuration?
> 1) jetty.xml
> 2) webdefault.xml
> 3) OPTIONS=.... along with their corresponding XML config files, most 
> importantly the JMX option, Server,ajp,setuid would be nice to have



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to